To: outofstyle
If they only lost one engine, I'm kind of surprised they couldn't make it back to the base, unless there was another problem. Still, to put that thing down in a cornfield, loaded, and have all 17 onboard survive? Miracle. That's the best word for it.
}:-)4
188 posted on
04/03/2006 7:20:18 AM PDT by
Moose4
("I will shoulder my musket and brandish my sword/In defense of this land and the word of the Lord")
To: Moose4
One of the video clips I saw early on this morning showed just how close to the runway they were.
The land where it went down is a potato farm.
192 posted on
04/03/2006 7:28:26 AM PDT by
Gabz
(Smokers are the beta version)
To: Moose4
"Still, to put that thing down in a cornfield, loaded, and have all 17 onboard survive? Miracle. That's the best word for it."
For a short time in the late 60s, before the plane flew, I was peripherally involved with the test track instrumentation for the landing gear load testing for the C5A. They fitted a load cart with a landing gear and drove it back and forth on sections of concrete and asphalt runways/taxiways. The rumor we heard was that the C5A landing gear was designed to operate from dirt strips. Don't know if anyone ever tried it.
To: Moose4
I heard something about a hydraulic failure.
211 posted on
04/03/2006 8:34:40 AM PDT by
Fred Hayek
(Liberalism is a mental disorder)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson