Posted on 04/02/2006 10:29:53 PM PDT by Coleus
Isn't this Oklahoma's issue? California ought stay the hell out of it.
Why does the FBI continue to stonewall on OKC, Flight 800, and more recently the student suicide bomber ("nothing to see here"), which has been completely whitewashed. Don't they give a shit about the people getting the straight story? Or are they too busy covering asses in DC?
I managed to plow through THE THIRD TERRORIST, and while it is an INCREDIBLY badly written book, it does make a compelling case for a Middle Eastern connection. If there is truth in even a tenth of what the author says, it warrants a new investigation.
Truth about an attack on U.S. soil is everybody's business.
Bush is trying to protect the office of the President. Clinton stunk the place up so bad that if everything he did and didn't do while he was there were to come out, it would ruin the Presidency for decades. The stink would be left on everyone who ever had or ever will hold that office.
Yes- until the moment NYC asks for help (which they obviously must have in 2001, implicitly anyway....).
Not everything in california is bad.
Ahhh but Clinton could not have rallied all the "hate gunowner" crap if he had not had McVeigh to point to as a scapegoat for all gunowners. Remember we are all racist militia members, ex military persons and other assorted dissidents to his idea of utopia USA> He even could throw in a little anti-Catholic hate. Or at least the left wing nuts at DU do this for their party.
The Reagan library, and Michael Savage!
You are so full of crap. The people in NYC and OK mean just as much to me as my adopted state, Idaho...
"The Reagan library, and Michael Savage!"
What about FreeRepublic ?
That comes out of California too.
All persons have been accounted for from the blast.
However, there is the problem of an extra leg in camo clothing without a body attached to it. Who does this leg belong to?
Also, the morning of the blast, ABC news announced that "Swarthy men of middle eastern extraction in running suits had been seen fleeing from the area."
I heard that announcement.
This is completely logical. Each state can fight off attacks on its own, confident that other states will not interfere.
Just imagine the states requesting the right to overfly each others' airspace to retaliate.
Imagine terrorists hiding out in, say, Michigan -- while the KC militia negotiates with Missouri, Illinois and Indiana to get to them.
Steve, congratulations, you've got a winning idea there.
Yes he did. He galvanized support at a time when his presidency was in serious jeopardy. He created the VRWC so that his supporters would unite against the dreaded right wing and accept anything he did. That is how he survived impeachment. Many people didn't like what he did but they hated the right wing more.
So your personal emotions for Idaho, New York City, and Oklahoma have what to do with the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Clinton wanted us to concentrate on domestic terror. He almost completely ignored the Islamist threat and only had a handful of FBI agents working on that problem.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.