....................
Disability advocates say that the Texas 'futile care' statute is a violation of patients' rights and autonomy. They suggest the law should be 'euthanized' and replaced by legislation that protects the rights and lives of patients in the health care system.
Austin, TX (PRWEB) May 2, 2006 -- The publicity surrounding the struggle to save the life of Andrea Clark - sentenced to die under Texas' "Futile Care" Statute - has brought attention once again to little know hospital policies regarding so-called "futility." There is also a second case in Texas right now that hasn't gotten as much attention involving a Vietnamese woman named Yenlang Vo, in Austin, TX. Ms. Clark is in a hospital in Houston, TX.
This isn't the first time the Texas law on "futile care" has received national attention. During the struggle for Terri Schiavo's life, Sun Hudson, a 6-month-old boy with a serious condition was removed from a feeding tube over his mother's objections under the Texas law. It received brief attention from Democrats pointing out that Sun Hudson was dying against his mother's wishes under a law signed by ex-governor George Bush. But the critics (U.S. Rep. John Conyers for one) seemed more motivated to score political points than in having serious moral qualms about the Texas "futile care" law.
Disability Advocates Say Texas 'Futile Care' Law Should Be Euthanized
8mm
Tyranny work just isn't easy.
..............
Judicial independence and impartiality are under assault from many directions these days.
Supreme Court nominees are bullied into expressing their philosophies as judicial Pablum lest one interest group or another take offense. The failure of state and federal judges to knuckle under to pressure from Congress last year on the Terri Schiavo case resulted in threats of retribution. A Maryland lawmaker even tried recently to have a Baltimore Circuit Court judge removed from office because she ruled against the state ban on gay marriage.
And now it seems no holds are barred in judicial election contests, thanks to a Supreme Court decision that struck down prohibitions on judicial candidates expressing legal and political views.
8mm
In Texas, the zombies argue that a hospital "Ethics Committee" has the absolute right to refuse medical treatment. Now it is the patient and her family who have nothing to say about it.
Quiz: deduce what legal principle the zombies agree on?