Your opinion is allowed, is it not? What a silly comment.
You also avoided the obvious. You responded to my post about ONE Congressman who some here say is the truthteller at the expense of THREE Generals, the POTUS, the U.S. Navy and Coast Guard. If you'd like to address that, you know it is "allowed". You've been here since 1998, lol.
See 1957.
"You've been here since 1998, lol."
And you haven't, LOL. And I already addressed this by saying they are all singing off of the same page. They have their marching orders. It' funny how the Coast Guard had grave concerns, but as soon as that info made it into the press, the Coast Guard suddenly began singing a different tune about how their concerns had all been addressed. Yeah, sure. Plus it is immaterial that the POTUS, US Navy, Coast Guard and Generals say otherwise. Generals, the Navy, and the POTUS have no part in port security. The Coast Guard does, so that's one out of the four you list. None of them could guarantee who might be hired that would have terrorist ties, by the Dubai port managers. None of them could guarantee what would be shipped where, when, and how, the port managers would do that. All it would take is a couple of rotten terrorist apples in the Dubai port managers' infrastructure, to do us harm. By the way, we weren't talking about my ability to express an opinion, which I do often and in rather thorough detail everytime I post. We were discussing a Congressman's opinion as vs. generals, POTUS, the U.S. Navy rep and the Coast Guard rep, all who answer to the POTUS, don't they. He's their boss. Funny how they all agree w/his opinion.
It's the entire Congress, with a few notable exceptions.
In addition to the overwhelming majority of the American public, who are usually right about things that directly impact their personal security.
Which state's representatives were prominent attendees at the Arab-Islamic conference in October of 1973-which occured at the height of the Yom Kippur War-where the Arabs tried to break the back of Europe and the United States-and in the former case succeeded beyond their wildest expectations-for having the temerity to not unreservedly endorse the annihilation of Israel's citizens?
I'll answer for you.
It was Abu Dhabi.
Which pseudo-country bankrolled the construction of the grand mosque and Islamic center of Rome-whose odious minaret now dwarfs even the most hallowed, indispensable elements of the Church in the city where the Papacy is headquartered?
None other than the very UAE that some faux conservatives are now falling over themselves to venerate, God knows why.
These people are not allies, no matter how much that lie is repeated it will never be true.