[jec41]

Either something is wrong with your definition of "observed as a fact," or the theory of evolution is hereby disproven by your own criteria. Moving on.

You should move on. Evolution is a fact. The definition of evolution is change. Change or evolution is observed by everyone everyday. It is fact, whether that change is in society, species, or any thing else. You are changed from your mother and father. This change is observed as a fact, you are not the same clones. Science observes this fact gives evidence for the fact and gives a explanation of the fact (reproduction). You are significantly changed from your ancestors. ID creation, the origin of man and all such faith and belief of mans beginning is unknown. They cannot be observed as a fact. Science neither can observe or explain a unknown. ID creation, the origin of man and all such faith and belief of mans beginning is unknown and is argued by philosophy. Do you claim that by faith and belief you know the origin of man. You saw it, witnessed it, and observed it as a fact of mans beginning, if so inform science so they can observe the same fact.

[RHINO369]

Two questions, ID is supposed to be evolution, with a side assumption that God planed it this way right? Then why do all the pro IDer think evolution is BS. If you don't believe that evolution is an accurate theory, then you can't believe in ID. Wheres the flaw in that logic.

Also to creationists, how do you explain that there have been many different species of humans, many being alive at the same time? These humans couldn't mate with regular humans, which means they are undoubtably a different species (the very definition of species).

[Buggman]

Evolution is a fact.

Right then and there, you proved that you are a evolutionary religionist expounding a dogma, not a scientist.