Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClaireSolt
In both your examples I think the state has claimed the oil industry. This is the crux of the matter, in both cases the oil money was not earned. Capitalism is about creating new capital through hard work, not having it fall into your lap or stealing it.

This is way different than starting out with nothing like the US did and earning capital through hard work, before oil was even discovered. The US did not have the advantage of a huge supply of unearned capital to work with.

If you say the UAE has money because of capitalism, you would also have to say Venezuela has money because of socialism, when neither is the case, the reality is they won the oil money lottery. The poor in Venezuela have more now than they did before Chavez, would you say that is because of socialism? No, it is because oil money is greasing their economy to the point the poor have more, their standard of living has went up, which is why Chavez is so popular amoung the lower class there.

466 posted on 03/26/2006 3:46:21 PM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]


To: dynoman
What kind of economy did the UAE have before they started picking money of the oil money tree?

The US was capitalistic from the begining and unlike the nomadic ME countries was wealthy before oil.

If oil had not been discovered in the ME would the UAE have become a "capitalistic" country?? I highly doubt it as they had not embraced capitalism up to that point.

467 posted on 03/26/2006 3:53:45 PM PST by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marylin vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 466 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson