Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: r9etb
And the hard, hard lesson of the First World War was that lack of a standing army made timely mobilization impossible when large bodies of troops were required.

Just an observation: if every capable citizen, male and female, is armed, then there's no "mobilization" required. It's true that it would be impossible to go around invading other countries without assembling an army, though...

38 posted on 02/20/2006 8:05:29 AM PST by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Shalom Israel
Just an observation: if every capable citizen, male and female, is armed, then there's no "mobilization" required. It's true that it would be impossible to go around invading other countries without assembling an army, though...

Rifles were by far the least of our worries back then -- but even so, you need to have everybody armed with the same rifles in order to be able to efficiently supply your troops. Gosh ... rules and regulations regarding what weapons to bear?

We had almost no artillery, and almost no ammunition to fire from the guns we did have. We had no airplanes. We had no machine guns. We had to borrow or buy all of those from the British and French. We also had to rely on British transports to get our guys over to Europe.

41 posted on 02/20/2006 8:10:05 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson