Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SJackson
Smarter was tongue in cheek. Within the last decade or so I remember Gore, Bush, Kerry, Clinton in hunting exhibitions, always birds. I'm sure there are other examples, but why always birds? Obviously they presume that's viewed more favorably than hunting something on four legs.

Why birds? They are easier to hunt and you can get alot more of them. Plus you don't have to worry as much about someone hitting your dogs as much by accident.

572 posted on 02/12/2006 3:31:10 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 465 | View Replies ]


To: pepperhead; proud_yank

"Why birds? They are easier to hunt and you can get alot more of them. Plus you don't have to worry as much about someone hitting your dogs as much by accident."

Man, you lost me on that statement. Sounds like someone who has never shot at a small flying object, with dogs in close proximity.

Try shooting a dove sometime. I hit a lot of clouds and waste a lot of ammunition, but it's the comraderie (sp) I'm there for -- and the gumbo, watching the dogs work, etc.


613 posted on 02/12/2006 3:55:33 PM PST by girlangler (I'd rather be fishing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson