Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: television is just wrong

I'm not an Attorney, however I think ownership starts after you leave the store, for anything you didn't bring with you upon entering.

That is the reason shoplifters are stopped "after" they walk out the door.


82 posted on 02/02/2006 10:52:42 AM PST by Beagle8U (An "Earth First" kinda guy ( when we finish logging here, we'll start on the other planets.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Beagle8U

As long as someone is inside the store, it may be difficult to prove theft or intent of theft. However, once a customer leaves a store in possession of store merchandize he didn't pay for, the issue of intent becomes more provable.


88 posted on 02/02/2006 11:22:46 AM PST by Enterprise (The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Beagle8U

"...I think ownership starts after you leave the store, for anything you didn't bring with you upon entering."

Does that mean I retain ownershop of whatever money I paid for that "anything" until I leave the store and my ownership of the "anything" starts?

Can I just go get it if I still retain ownership?

Or does the store have ownership of the money and the "anything" until I leave?

Is there any point at which I can have ownership of both the money and the "anything"?


120 posted on 02/02/2006 8:00:42 PM PST by KrisKrinkle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson