Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alito : Two Nominee Strategies. One Worked.~
The New York Times ^ | January 31, 2006 | DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK

Posted on 01/30/2006 9:16:41 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 — The week before his Supreme Court confirmation hearings, Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr. e-mailed the text of his opening statement to the White House. It included very little about his legal thinking, dwelled at length on his family and opened with a tired and rambling joke about courtroom banter between a lawyer and a judge.

The response from the White House: "Perfect, don't change a word," according to an administration official who was granted anonymity because Judge Alito's preparation sessions were confidential.

As the last obstacles to confirmation faded away Monday, Democratic aides said their party had initially expected Judge Alito to live up to his reputation as "Scalito," suggesting a conservative firebrand in the mold of Justice Antonin Scalia. Failing to adjust to his meekness, Democratic aides admit they searched too hard for scandal in Judge Alito's past.

The White House, meanwhile, sought to take advantage of Judge Alito's low-key, almost shy demeanor to build sympathy for him. They say they succeeded beyond all expectations when Judge Alito's wife, Martha-Ann, walked out in tears from his confirmation hearings.

"Any time they are yelling, preaching, lecturing, and you are cool and calm and breathing deep, you are winning," the administration official said the White House team told Judge Alito. "What that means on television sets where the American people are watching this is, you look good and they look bad. It was the central operating premise."

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senator Harry Reid

of Nevada, the Democratic leader, agreed. "It was a classic rope-a-dope," Mr. Manley said, referring to the boxing tactic of leaning against the ropes to let an opponent exhaust himself punching.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; alito; alitovote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last
To: citizencon
A Times-quoted "anonymous" Administration official is synonymous to a UFO.

LOL!!

121 posted on 01/30/2006 10:20:52 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

ROFLMAO!


122 posted on 01/30/2006 10:21:43 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

A part of that movie was filmed at my high school.


123 posted on 01/30/2006 10:22:11 PM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
For more humor listen and watch Ted Kennedy explain how he was rope a doped.

Ted Kennedy blows a gasket 1/30/2006
124 posted on 01/30/2006 10:25:12 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild
(Book)
Authors:Michelle Malkin

Manufacturer:Regnery Publishing

Released:24 October, 2005

125 posted on 01/30/2006 10:26:56 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin


Perfect post! Thanks!


126 posted on 01/30/2006 10:30:41 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach


I think they thought they could defeat this nomination!


127 posted on 01/30/2006 10:32:29 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Chivas Ted brings up the Swift Boat Vets. doh!


128 posted on 01/30/2006 10:33:48 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Gawd, he's a filthy pig and that damn new england accent. "I 'sore' (saw) in the NYT..." I hate him. Can you tell?


129 posted on 01/30/2006 10:35:37 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: onyx

They were doing it for George.....Soros that is!


130 posted on 01/30/2006 10:38:10 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach


I'll take our George over theirs.


131 posted on 01/30/2006 10:38:42 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I'm done; some days there is just TOO much to get hyped up about and I get so dang hacked off I can't sleep.


132 posted on 01/30/2006 10:39:29 PM PST by Howlin (Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: bannie
The punch that would take the wind out of that murdering kennedy would be to have someone in the Senate confront him in front of a live feed camera with, "Have you spoken to the Kopechneys lately?" or, "Do you ever regret killing MaryJo?"

Wasn't Kennedy's theme: "If you were a black person in need of support, judge Alito would not Help. If you were abused by the executive branch's over-reaching power, judges Alito would not help" (wel you get the idea). Wouldn't it have been hillarius if a pubbie senator would have gotten up and said: "If you were a women in distress and about to drown, Senator Kennedy would not help"

133 posted on 01/30/2006 10:39:51 PM PST by Go Gordon (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Howlin


Me too.
See you for the vote later this morning.


134 posted on 01/30/2006 10:40:21 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Go Gordon

HA! Better, yet!!!


135 posted on 01/30/2006 10:42:41 PM PST by bannie (The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: kpp_kpp
makes one almost think that the whole miers thing was part of the plan.

I was thinking the same dang thing, so the next time Bush nominates a judge, the RATs have to take it easy for fear that he withdrawls the nominie and supplants them with a Roberts/Alito clone.

136 posted on 01/30/2006 10:42:45 PM PST by Go Gordon (I don't know what your problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Hey Howlin,

I know you were upset over the Miers thing but what do you think now???


137 posted on 01/30/2006 10:42:51 PM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard; All
"Mark Levin."

I posted to freeper "holdonnow" on a thread awhile back, asking if he would PLEASE take Scott McClellan's job.

It got a big "YES" from most of the freeper's that read my request, but no answer from freeper "holdonnow"....dang it...

138 posted on 01/30/2006 10:43:32 PM PST by musicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: okie01
"I'm betting that the story represents a "best guess" scenario, totally fabricated in the Times news room."

Here's one line that the NY Times fabricated: "Any time they are yelling, preaching, lecturing, and you are cool and calm and breathing deep, you are winning," the administration official said the White House team told Judge Alito."

How do I know? I know that they fabricated the above line because the White House/Alito liaison team doesn't speak condescendingly to the Judge...and the above is condescending (or at least pedantic).

Uh, uh. Did *not* happen. The White House staff did *not* tell Judge Alito that his deep breathing meant that he was winning.

Now look at the above quote in its context (to see the bigger fabrication): "Any time they are yelling, preaching, lecturing, and you are cool and calm and breathing deep, you are winning," the administration official said the White House team told Judge Alito. "What that means on television sets where the American people are watching this is, you look good and they look bad. It was the central operating premise."

Uh, uh...Busted!

Look at the time line. The "central opening premise" is at the...wait for it...opening. It's not *after* the hearings have started.

So again, we can safely surmise that the NY Times is fabricating the above for their "article."

139 posted on 01/30/2006 10:45:56 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Southack
It would be interesting to have a pool on Kirkpatrick's "real, live sources who actually said what they were reported to have said".

I don't know how it could be proven, but my selection would be "two" -- James Manley (Reid's spokesperson) and Laura Capps (Kennedy's spokesperson), both named. The rest was woven with whole cloth, out of material furnished by these two...plus Kirkpatrick's fertile imagination.

140 posted on 01/30/2006 11:00:21 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-164 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson