Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

Chuck just said that a jurist who tends to rule "rightward" is unqualified to be a judge.

I don't remember him ever suggesting that Ginsberg was unqualified because she tended to rule "leftward", even though she was replacing a conservative jurist.


1,486 posted on 01/12/2006 9:39:37 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1476 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT

rightward is wrongward to them


1,492 posted on 01/12/2006 9:40:29 AM PST by Howlin (Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1486 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT

Perzactly. I wish Sessions had picked up on something like that.


1,498 posted on 01/12/2006 9:41:00 AM PST by don-o (Don't be a Freeploader. Do the right thing. Become a Monthly Donor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1486 | View Replies ]

To: CharlesWayneCT
Chuck just said that a jurist who tends to rule "rightward" is unqualified to be a judge.

Libs love a Justice who's ready for approval by Dick, Chuck and Teddy.
Pat, Joe and Dianne like to preheat the pan, to fry nominees deemed "right-heady."

1,515 posted on 01/12/2006 9:43:52 AM PST by syriacus (Chuck Schumer is outclassed intellectually by Bush's judicial nominees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1486 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson