I'm trying to enlighten you on conservative constitutional interpretation. You may be enlightened or you can choose to stay on the bus with the liberals on the court. Nobody claimed it had the "force of law". You just made that up now, didn't ya?
I'm trying to enlighten you on conservative constitutional interpretation. You may be enlightened or you can choose to stay on the bus with the liberals on the court. Nobody claimed it had the "force of law". You just made that up now, didn't ya?
Now, don't be testy. I did end my comment with "(It does show Rehnquist's opinion, which is what I suspect you posted it to show.)"
I am just trying to put things in perspective, mostly for the lurkers. And I didn't try to claim you were posting it in any negative way, but rather that you posted to illustrate Rehnquist's opinion.
I don't favor the attack kinds of posts. I think I can get more done with research and logic, and politeness, than attacks.
But occasionally I might slip in a little satire, or a pun, so you better read carefully!