Nice one, resort to name calling for the people who have principles. Who said isolationist? Totally free market and exporting our freedoms through commerce is the way to go...not exporting "freedom" via war. You'll find nothing I have said out of line with the word of God nor that of the predominant founding fathers.
Who cares about FISA? The treaty must fall in line with the constitution or it is of non-effect. Oh wait, that is just me being a kook because I believe in the rule of law as established by the Constitution. Does that make you a communist and or socialist....hmmmm maybe, but that would be name calling.
The names all fit. I've dealt with a lot of your type here lately. Y'all have no rational argument at all and I've decided it's better to ridicule the lot of you than to further debate you.
During times of war, unalienable rights may best be protected through non-Constitutional means. This country has a long history of CIC's -- from the War of 1812 and the Civil War all the way to the present -- who during times of war supersede the Constitution.
The check has always been, is it necessary to do so and when the war is over, are these super-constitutional actions brought to an end.