Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I love the way the AP finds a couple of America hating lefties to bad mouth the President and he LEGAL acts. Then, the AP slips this in at the end as the last sentence of the article: "One bright spot for the White House was a new poll showing that a strong majority of Americans oppose, as does Bush and most lawmakers, an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq. The AP-Ipsos poll found 57 percent of those surveyed said the U.S. military should stay until Iraq is stabilized."

The Libs are too busy protecting the terrorists to worry about the safety of U.S. citizens!!! Libs...keep on talking...the public sees you for what you are...traitors!!!

1 posted on 12/17/2005 5:21:42 PM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
To: frankjr; 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub; mhking; Memother; Alamo-Girl; chesty_puller; GRRRRR; Bigun; ...

Ping


2 posted on 12/17/2005 5:24:39 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Why doesn't Pelosi cut out the nonsense and just tell the truth? Either she didn't allow herself the opportunity to know when the information became available, or she knew and is feigning outrage now.


3 posted on 12/17/2005 5:30:46 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

I'm watching Fox right now and even they are still getting this wrong. They're saying Bush authorized domestic eavesdropping. No mention of the fact that these "domestic" calls were to persons overseas.


4 posted on 12/17/2005 5:31:55 PM PST by saganite (The poster formerly known as Arkie 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/12/20051217.v.html


5 posted on 12/17/2005 5:32:52 PM PST by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Dont worry Nancy, Bush isnt after your stash. Hes after terrorists.


6 posted on 12/17/2005 5:34:08 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

It's about time W stood his ground instead of backpeddling. These congressional leaders, who have apparently been advised of the whole thing, now have to try to convince the country that they are outraged about the whole thing, as usual.


7 posted on 12/17/2005 5:34:11 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (Some people are too stupid to be ashamed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Libs...keep on talking...the public sees you for what you are...traitors!!!

There seems to be a sub-culture of 'traitorism' developing in our country . It has to be countered.
8 posted on 12/17/2005 5:34:33 PM PST by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
"I didn't hear him specify any legal right, except his right as president, which in a democracy doesn't make much sense," Bamford said in an interview. "Today, what Bush said is he went around the law, which is a violation of the law — which is illegal."

The program has oversight from the three branches of govt., which is a hell of a lot more than you can say for Bubba Klinton's adventures in foreign and domestic policy.

Funny, I don't remember these media legal "experts" having these kinds of problems with Waco. And at that time, religious separatists and rednecks were the enemy, not terrorists.

10 posted on 12/17/2005 5:37:07 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("Sharpei diem - Seize the wrinkled dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
If Bug Eyes has any dignity or self-respect, she ahould kill herself and save taxpayers the cost of executing her after she's convicted of treason.


12 posted on 12/17/2005 5:41:29 PM PST by Viking2002 (Allah FUBAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
If the democrats become any more disloyal, they'll be wearing turbans and white robes.

The President MUST send out the FBI to find, arrest, and prosecute the source of the intercept story. It either came from the Senate democrats, or democrats inside CIA.

13 posted on 12/17/2005 5:42:02 PM PST by Rapscallion (They're no longer Americans; they're democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

This is all so orchestrated between the rats and the leftist media. They do this everytime there is good news coming out of Irag, such as the elections or constitution vote, or here at home during an important judge nomination, cabinet post, UN post, or important legislation vote. Anything and everything, from the plame game, gitmo, katrina, etc., and now this.

It's all so damn predictable.. and dangerous. America was attacked dammit, an act of war was waged against this country and these rat idiots REFUSE to accept that because they are not in power. God help us.


15 posted on 12/17/2005 5:42:34 PM PST by SeaBiscuit (God Bless all who defend America and Friends, the rest can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
No more panties on the terrorists' heads
No more Koran flushings
No more Torture (perceived or not)
No more secret CIA prisons
No more Patriot act
No more eavesdropping on terrorists

Yup, the dems have screwed us over. And when the next big one happens, it will be Bush's fault.

16 posted on 12/17/2005 5:46:10 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

If a Lib Dem or a RINO wins the next Presidential election, expect a dirty bomb or a suitcase nuke detonation in a U.S. city before their first term is half over. They have no concern about the true threat that we face.


17 posted on 12/17/2005 5:46:47 PM PST by appleharvey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Nice fake headline.
18 posted on 12/17/2005 5:48:19 PM PST by new yorker 77 (FAKE POLLS DO NOT TRANSLATE INTO REAL VOTERS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Please help me understand...

How does eavesdropping (for whatever the reason) not violate the 4th amendment?

I'm not trying to point any fingers or anything, I'm just wondering what Bush, NSA, etc. did to avoid conflict with the constitution?
21 posted on 12/17/2005 5:54:15 PM PST by birbear (Admit it. you clicked on the "I have already previewed" button without actually previewing the post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

I think this will turn into anothe misread of public opinion by the leftist....

I think Americans expect and welcome these actions by President Bush and will frown upon their leaks...

I also think Bush should get immediate court approval to turn the antennas on the reporters of NYTimes/WAPost/AP/Time etc and find out who their contacts are. The let loose the FBI...He could also monitor the staff of the Congressmen who sit on the related committees.

Just IMO, but find them, arrest them and imprison them.

Also, with the Patriot Act expiring, the Gorelick WALL may go back up...Just what the leftists want so they cannot be tracked or prosecuted!


22 posted on 12/17/2005 5:55:55 PM PST by Prost1 (I get my news at Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
Yeah, Bush lied and got us into a multi-billion dollar war that's killed thousands of Iraqis and Americans. Now he's running illegal domestic surveillance.

If this crap is true, why haven't all/any of these powerful Democrats pushed for impeachment or pressed criminal charges?

Because none of it would stand up in a REAL court of law? Because it's nothing but accusatory political rhetoric based on falsehoods?

23 posted on 12/17/2005 5:56:55 PM PST by DTogo (Merry CHRISTmas, and a healthy & happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

So she admits they were briefed on the E.O.s? Stay on it W. Piss on the queer bait commiecRATS. We see the S.O.B.s for what they are. Shove it up their ass.


28 posted on 12/17/2005 6:10:23 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said she had been told on several occasions that Bush had authorized unspecified activities by the National Security Agency...

What did Pelosi know, and when did she know it?

30 posted on 12/17/2005 6:21:04 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: frankjr

Good for the President in fighting back.

So, here's what we know. We know members of the United States Senate are leaking secretive information vital to the security of the United States for a) political reasoning b) Blackmail (McCain and the secret prisons).

They need to be indicted, tried and hung.

It's becoming quite clear why the President relinquished on some issues, to prevent these traitors from leaking more sensitive materials but we're just going to have to live with the consequences of the leaks. Try them Mr. President. If they retaliate with leaked date, put them before a firing squad.


31 posted on 12/17/2005 7:06:20 PM PST by Soul Seeker (Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson