[Jrabbit]

OH FOR THE LOVE OF GOD!!

Apology from the republican!! WHY??????????????????????

[Political Junkie Too]

He was speaking as if they were debating a resolution introduced by Murtha, when in fact, the debate was introduced by Republican Duncan Hunter in the spirit of Murtha's comments yesterday. The Democrats want to make this a Republican call to withdraw troops without an orderly plan.

-PJ

[Soul Seeker]

Doesn't matter. He said what he said, and that's the point. It's a court trick. The "Jury" never forgets what was said. ven if it's "stricken" from consideration.

Davis called them out for acting like children while the ADULTS are fighting in the field.

[Bulldaddy]

That whole thing with Lantos was purely for show. The Indiana Repub made reference to Murtha's resolution when the precise matter being debated is Duncan Hunter's resolution. So, Lantos asks "what resolution is being debated" and Dan Akroyd says "that's a matter for debate. The Dems go wild. So just to calm them down, the Ind-Repub says sorry, didn't mean to suggest we're debating the Murtha resolution, can we now get back on track (Losers)?

No big deal, just Dem grandstanding.

[rightinthemiddle]

Because Dimocrats love to be VICTIMS!!!!