To: Ichneumon
"Giving the go-ahead to the publishing of material you believe to be "fatally flawed" is a serious professional lapse in the realm of prestigious science journals." Wait a minute. "Prestigious science journals" publish only stuff they agree with?
368 posted on
11/13/2005 7:45:12 PM PST by
Liberty Wins
(Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
To: All
"Twist and Shout" placemarker. Out for the night.
369 posted on
11/13/2005 7:49:11 PM PST by
VadeRetro
(Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
To: Liberty Wins
Science journals publishing only material that makes them comfortable would produce a closed circle of the faithful preaching to each other.
I am reminded of the way Reagan chose his White House staff. He could have appointed all of them from his conservative followers. However, he had a mixture of conservative, liberal and (ycchh) moderate advisors, because he felt the back-and-forth discussion contributed to the best decisions in the end.
370 posted on
11/13/2005 8:04:27 PM PST by
Liberty Wins
(Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
To: Liberty Wins
"Wait a minute. "Prestigious science journals" publish only stuff they agree with?"
Your astute observation is very revealing. It explains a lot about the scientific establishment world.
To: Liberty Wins
Wait a minute. "Prestigious science journals" publish only stuff they agree with? Yep, that's what Ichneumon essentially said. I haven't yet heard him explain his statement in any other way.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson