It *is* garbage, and you sort of "forgot" to mention the vast numbers (an overwhelming majority) of very *non*illiterate scientists who agree on that point.
Why would you want to be grossly dishonest like that?
Please respond.
when there are Ph.D-level working scientists who *do* consider it science.
Yeah, about ten at the very most (out of millions of working scientists), who are raking in the cash selling their mass-market books on the subject to the AECreationists hungry for some sort of "validation". Heck, I've been tempted to do the same myself, except *I* have too many ethics.
Did you have some sort of actual point to make?
Why would you want to be grossly dishonest like that?
At least you didn't call me a liar.
I say the majority of the scientists out there think ID should get a fair shake, but are afraid to admit it to their peers due to the fact that the institutions they work for are usually run by atheists. It's all about job security. So there, genius.