Replies

Looks like you folks are correct! - Darn, that's three for me before lunch!

Well, don't jump the gun there. I'm thinking Cary is right now and that I've been swallowing the pro-immigrant bilge.

Looks like a strong precedent against any argument for anchor babies.

OTOH, it might take a strongly worded constitutional amendment to get Congress to enforce the borders. But then, we are back to the matter of politics and strategy, not constitutional law.

A Paleo-FReeper salute for Carry's erudite posting. Reminds me of the Golden Era of FreeRepublic. But then, it's not over as long as we get posts like these.

I notice Carry's seniority date is from the Xlinton Reign Of Terror so that explains her diligence on constitutional matters. Too bad it doesn't explain my own laxness and my (now corrected) swallowing of the 'anchor baby' propaganda.