Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: notigar
Thanks, but one thing I missed is how wide Fitz would go - or not go. There are a number of things I would've expected to be fleshed out a bit more - who was on Marine Two deciding how to respond to inquiries, on the same day Libby talked to Cooper? What did they talk about, and what was decided, etc.? I figured he'd snag an aide or two to Libby.

And, of course, the lingering mystery question - who was Novak's initial source?

Given the descriptions in the indictment - if the information therein is true - I think Fitzgerald showed a great deal of restraint.

3,170 posted on 10/29/2005 4:58:14 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3161 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
Given the descriptions in the indictment - if the information therein is true - I think Fitzgerald showed a great deal of restraint.

Restraint for what? This whole friggin thing was supposed to center around who outted a COVERT CIA AGENT we learned yesterday after a two year investigation has concluded know one has!!! All Fitz did was indict someone who supposedly lied about WHEN he obtained Plame's name...Who wasn't even covert and being bandied about in Washington like front page Inquiry News!

That's so friggin lame and bogus it's not even funny. Fitz did nothing more than went on a fishing expidention to hook a BIG mouth and got one.

We've now learned there is truly no "leaking" here by anyone, and let me also say this, MILLER has big one's for trying to protect Libby, at least it appears she was really trying to protect him now.

3,171 posted on 10/29/2005 5:17:35 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson