Who are the people who were summoned before the Grand Jury that would be able to testify about "oil for food"?
Why is everyone so eager to ignore the simple facts of the case. This is just plain goofy.
"Who are the people who were summoned before the Grand Jury that would be able to testify about "oil for food"?
Why is everyone so eager to ignore the simple facts of the case. This is just plain goofy."
Because we want to understand the context of the case. There is "the case" and there is how it came about.
If there were indictments, I assume that the Defense attorneys would start a discovery process vis-a-vis Mr. Wilson, going into his character, motivations, etc., and if there were firm evidence that what we are talking about were true, then that would be introduced into the case.