I laugh because you are so laughable.
Even you quote the Solon O'Donnell who in turn quotes the judge:
"O'Donnell continues: "Some of us have theorized that the prosecutor may have given up the leak case in favor of a perjury case, but Tatel still refers to it simply as a case which involves the alleged exposure of a covert agent.
Er, that's what it is about. An allegation of the exposure of a covert agent.
But you know something the judge doesn't, I guess. LOL
churchillbuff, I'm enjoying your posts...What do you make of the information at the link in this post? TIA
To: RAldrich
Anyone seen this? http://cryptome.sabotage.org/plame-eyeball.htm ... at the bottom of the page: JACQUELINE C WILSON, 55, 4612 CHARLESTON TER NW, WASHINGTON, DC 20007 (202) 3429888, in the center VALERIE WILSON
4612 CHARLESTON TER NW
WASHINGTON DC 20007
(202) 342-9888
I find this strange.
3 posted on 10/22/2005 8:08:58 PM PDT by pnut22
http://cryptome.sabotage.org/plame-eyeball.htm