The side bar about "sexual learning and sexual expression in the womb" is a bit over the top, but the content of the main text is just the facts -- and conveniently leaves out more titillating info like the fact that ultrasound technology has enabled viewing of male fetuses having erections.
It may be fact but it's presented so as to justify their position. Little girls should not be having to deal with these issues (abortion, homosexuality). It's hypocritical and deceptive for a company to market such wholesome products to little girls and then direct them to a site like Girl's Inc. Parents who want to have something safe for their girls to play with have been betrayed. If the liberals would stop forcing sex so into the limelight at progressively earlier ages, they might just begin to see a decrease in STD's, teen pregnancies, abortion, and sexual identity confusion. The arguement that kids have to be informed about these issues because that's what real life is all about, rots. They're the ones that have made real life like that. If it weren't for their efforts, kids could still be growing as kids.
rhythmic body movements and sensual body exploration by infants of both sexes sometimes result in orgasm.
How do they know? Are they using info from Kinsey's infamous Table 34?
Several qualitative studies have suggested that infants whose sexual behavior (genital and non-genital) was accepted as a natural part of development...
You've got to be kidding me! Sexual behavior of infants?!
Children do not reliably know their gender identity until age 2or 3. And even after that, many believe they might change sexes until age 4 or 5.
So children are hermaphrodites until age 5? Hey, who here changed their sex before kindergarten?
activities such as exploring a friend’s body may be more common than before. These healthy responses to sexual curiosity and affection for best friends do not tell us anything about what the adult sexual orientation of the young woman will be.
Now they're encouraging homosexual exploration to preadolescents.
The rest of the article is just rationalizations for pushing their specific sex ed agenda including teaching children about sexual desire. They end with a call for adolescent reproductive rights. And as the article notes, adolescence occurs as young as 8. Reproductive rights and education about sexual desire for 8 year olds? Isn't that the motto of a pedophile group?