To: patton; RunningWolf
Here's the Robert's thread...Isn't he too evasive to be on the Supreme Court?
2,027 posted on
09/16/2005 9:09:34 PM PDT by
phantomworker
(It is not the answer that enlightens, but the question.)
To: phantomworker
I dunno - I can't make up my mind on this guy.
2,028 posted on
09/16/2005 9:13:24 PM PDT by
patton
("Hard Drive Cemetary" - forthcoming best seller)
To: phantomworker
I cant really speak about how J. Roberts has answered and appeared.
It is though a sad state of affairs that the libs influence control the SCOTUS that much. That unfortunately is the political reality of the present.
But perhaps some of this is some DEM grandstanding for their base.. I hope it is.
I would like to see Bork in there, at least for a few years. We need more like Bork and Thomas.
Believe it or not I have went without TV for a good while. I use the INET and papers. I need to get it going again though, for the financials and the world news.
2,031 posted on
09/16/2005 9:45:16 PM PDT by
RunningWolf
(U.S. Army Veteran.....75-78)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson