Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kaktuskid

Nice try. Unfortunately, getting oil from tar sands requires a HUGE resevoir with which to dump the contaminants. I hate the Canadians usually, but they are an indicator of what that technology does. People don't like man made lakes period, let alone man made lakes of waste.

And coal is a fossil fuel, but doesn't burn nearly as good or clean as petroleum. In fact, that's why we shifted TO petroleum and AWAY from coal in the early 21st Century.

But I do like the Biomass idea, and especially the nuke power deal. I don't know why they aren't being exploited more now.


53 posted on 09/14/2005 12:14:36 PM PDT by The Black Knight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: The Black Knight

And coal is a fossil fuel, but doesn't burn nearly as good or clean as petroleum. In fact, that's why we shifted TO petroleum and AWAY from coal in the early 21st Century.

Ever heard of SASOL? The Fisher/Tropsch process?


64 posted on 09/14/2005 1:23:26 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: The Black Knight
But I do like the Biomass idea, and especially the nuke power deal. I don't know why they aren't being exploited more now.

Nuke power was environmentally "sensitive" (idiotic), and biofuels weren't economically competitive. With oil at $70+ a barrel and gas at $3.00+ a gallon, they are much more competitive.

66 posted on 09/14/2005 1:39:10 PM PDT by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson