Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StonyBurk

Only those rights specified in the Bill of Rights should be protected by the federal govrenment and none of the others like the right to life, liberty etc?


26 posted on 09/14/2005 5:52:52 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

Obviously, there is tension between the ninth and tenth amendments, some would even say they are mutually exclusive.

I agree with you, if I understand you correctly, the ninth is judiciable, but in every case, that tension is real and not easily decided.


28 posted on 09/14/2005 5:57:39 AM PDT by JusticeForAll76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

To: Raycpa

our federal government ceased to protect the right to life
when they were cowed by the corrupt Warren Court that
decided Roe v.Wade--and Doe v.Bolton creating a suspect
right to privacy in the shedding of innocent blood.Our constitution(not merely the attached Bill of rights) was
drafted to empower the national government to protect those
rights recognized as a gift from god ( not from Governments) enumerated in the Declaration of Independence.
The Federal Government has chosen to ignore the Declaration
ANd prefers to understand it as boreing old history modern
school children need not even be taught.


31 posted on 09/14/2005 6:58:53 AM PDT by StonyBurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson