Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IpaqMan; CWOJackson

Maybe Roberts said that if he felt that his personal views would cause him to be unable to fairly apply the law as a matter of conscience, he would recuse himself. What do you think? Of course, such a recusal on those grounds has NEVER happened, ever, so far as I know. Judges always feel they can be fair, always. They sometimes recuse themselves on the basis on conflict on interest given the parties involved. That is about it.


24 posted on 07/25/2005 9:24:32 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Torie
I have serious reservations about a judge announcing in advance that they would recuse themself on a specific topic. That would be no different then indicating how they would decide on the same topic.

This doesn't pass the smell test...and it's already been posted under a different newspaper banner.

26 posted on 07/25/2005 9:30:11 PM PDT by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson