Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kelly_2000
"Well, the "innocent until proven guilty thing" comes into play"

I was not suggesting bypassing the criminal justice process, anyone convicted of terrorism would be a candidate.

"Plus, in Kacyzski's case his brother helped catch him. "

Are you suggesting the punishment of an innocent man? why would that be promoted?

The original post said "terrorists and their families. If it's limited to those convicted, we're only talking about terrorists. The addendum was unneccesary and, quite frankly, offensive.

-Eric

2,203 posted on 07/21/2005 11:42:29 AM PDT by E Rocc (Anyone who thinks Bush-bashing is banned on FR has never read a Middle East thread >:))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2187 | View Replies ]


To: E Rocc
"The original post said "terrorists and their families. If it's limited to those convicted, we're only talking about terrorists. The addendum was unneccesary and, quite frankly, offensive. "

Nonsense you are being emotional and not logical. in a lot of cases of terrorism family members can be co conspirators. In those cases the similar punishment should apply. Why is my comment offensive this is a debate for goodness sake calm down

2,206 posted on 07/21/2005 11:44:32 AM PDT by Kelly_2000 (Because they stand on a wall and say nothing is going to hurt you tonight. Not on my watch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson