This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 07/15/2005 10:48:07 AM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Locked.
|
Skip to comments.
EXCLUSIVE: US Representative Tom Tancredo in Response to U.S. Nuke Threat: We Could Nuke Mecca
540 WFLA Orlando, FL ^
| July 15, 2005
| Pat Campbell-AM 540 WFLA
Posted on 07/15/2005 9:34:12 AM PDT by underwiredsupport
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 261 next last
To: AuH2ORepublican
You do realize, don't you, that the only thing the militant Islamics respect is force? Everything else, they laugh at. If you don't realize this, you should Google Osama's declaration of war, and see, in print, how he laughed at Clinton for all his efforts at appeasement--not only laughed, but he made it clear those efforts utterly disgusted him. One of these days, we might have to take our gloves off. You just can't win by taking an etiquette book to a war on terror.
61
posted on
07/15/2005 9:50:30 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: hosepipe
Nuking Mecca is WHAT the terrorists WANT..Yep. That would be their greatest recruiting tool of all-time. And the strategic effect it would have on protecting America would be a big fat zero.
With this soundbite, Tancedo has not only given al-Jazeera a soundbite that will be played over and over to demonize America, he's also guaranteed that he ill never, ever be President of the United States. Tancredo supporters should be upset about this statement.
62
posted on
07/15/2005 9:50:55 AM PDT
by
Phocion
(biologists : evolution :: economists : free trade -- on FR this analogy can have multiple meanings!)
To: Dane
" hillary gives many thanks for your and tancredo's kneejerkedness."
You can keep swallowing the RNC Kool Aid if you wish, how DARE a "vigilante" like myself wish for border control! Yeah, that's the ticket....the illegals just want to do "jobs americans wont do!"...
63
posted on
07/15/2005 9:50:56 AM PDT
by
Stellar Dendrite
(FAKE conservatism is more dangerous than liberalism <<<---at least you know what you're gonna get!)
To: Rutles4Ever
"I would rather he said something about overthrowing Iran or the Saudis."
Well, Al Queda wants to overthrow the Saudis too so we'd be helping them out there. As far as Iran goes, being a Shia regime, I doubt Al Queda would cry too many tears over that one either.
64
posted on
07/15/2005 9:51:01 AM PDT
by
Avenger
To: stockpirate
No, we should take it to the source. We all know what the source is: Mecca.
65
posted on
07/15/2005 9:51:25 AM PDT
by
MizSterious
(Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
To: AuH2ORepublican
Love your screen name. My Dad was a deligate that nominated Goldwater and brought back caned orange juice labeled AUH2O and lots of other memoribila.
66
posted on
07/15/2005 9:51:45 AM PDT
by
phil1750
(Love like you've never been hurt;Dance like nobody's watching;PRAY like it's your last prayer)
To: hosepipe; Dog
hey man...
don't bring common sense into a Tancredo thread!!!
:)
Let the Tancredites have their little wet dream about nuking Mecca. It isn't as if Tancredo himself will ever have his finger on the button....
To: piceapungens
68
posted on
07/15/2005 9:52:10 AM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: wideawake
We can win without murdering millions of civilians.
Even if it took a million to win, it would be worth it,
far more than a million American lives, lost because of
Islamic fanatics and backward guilty democrats.
Certainly, if the ChiComms can threaten us with nuclear
weapons over Taiwan, we can threaten Islam with the destruction of Mecca and Medina in the event that ISLAM
attacks us. For make no mistake, those who would attack us
are attacking in the name of Islam, for the goals of Islam.
69
posted on
07/15/2005 9:52:25 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: wideawake
70
posted on
07/15/2005 9:52:27 AM PDT
by
Aetius
To: Rutles4Ever
No, they don't want to lose mecca. They really really do not.
71
posted on
07/15/2005 9:52:28 AM PDT
by
G32
To: piceapungens
I agree Mr. Chamberlain, we should attempt to understand our enemies, not destroy them.I see, genius.
So it is your belief that Churchill's intention was to randomly kill millions of German civilians and that Chamberlain's mistake was opposition to this mythical Churchillian program?
You are a bona fide moron and a bloodthirsty genocidal maniac to boot.
72
posted on
07/15/2005 9:53:07 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
To: stockpirate
There are
other resources available, too.
(tagline applicable here)
73
posted on
07/15/2005 9:53:10 AM PDT
by
MarineDad
(Whenever mosques and JDAM's meet, civilization benefits.)
To: MikeinIraq; Coop
Sorry Mike... I'll try better the next time....:-)
74
posted on
07/15/2005 9:53:13 AM PDT
by
Dog
( Is Joe Wilson is just a character Rove created?)
To: wideawake
every secular Muslim state
What? Turkey?
75
posted on
07/15/2005 9:53:38 AM PDT
by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: G32
76
posted on
07/15/2005 9:53:51 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMan55
(DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
To: Stellar Dendrite
You can keep swallowing the RNC Kool Aid if you wish, how DARE a "vigilante" like myself wish for border control! Yeah, that's the ticket....the illegals just want to do "jobs americans wont do!"... See the link in reply #68.
77
posted on
07/15/2005 9:53:52 AM PDT
by
Dane
( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
To: AuH2ORepublican; All
If that's the case, then he should apologize, and explain that he got carried away. I am 100% in favor of targeting Islamic leaders (whether religious or secular) who foster or condone terrorism, but it is stooping to the level of the terrorists to bomb a holy site (of any religion) as retaliation or to "send a message." If terrorist leaders or their aiders and abettors are hiding out in a holy site, it becomes a tough question, since we can't let them shield themselves with their religion, but bombing the shrine when it doesn't have any terrorists hiding there would be like the British bombing the Catholic shrines of Lourdes or Fatima as retaliation of an IRA bombing.
- Are you serious? Apologies don't change the events of 911. How many Muslims have you heard apologizing?
- Apologies won't stop these Savages-In-Dirty Night Shirts from storming the city you live in, and separating your Cranial Cavity from your torso either!
- Apologies are the tactics of a Mentally Disturbed Liberal Mind-Set.
- Politically Correct Jewish Apologists were quoted as saying, "The Germans are a civilized people, there is no logic in killing us. We are skilled workers. We are very valuable to the German war effort!" I am sure those apologist were absolutely dumb-founded as they inhaled the fumes of Clycon-B.
Just my response to your claim that an apology is in order. Please rethink your logic.
UWS
78
posted on
07/15/2005 9:54:10 AM PDT
by
underwiredsupport
(...for the shape of things to come!)
To: underwiredsupport
That's the end of any Presidential aspirations he might have.
To: Dane
Hmm tom tancredo's PAC bosses(pat and bay buchanan), say we should placate the islamofascists.Is Pat also hiding under your bed and trying to steal your bag of magic beans?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 261 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson