An answer to the question at hand lies in my earlier reply. MS fought long and hard to get a large settlement. He stood there in court stating that he wanted to care for Terri until they passed away. He gets the money, and all of a sudden, "he remembers that Terri wouldn't want to live like that". He forbade even the most routine care.
You really should read up on this case. Hearsay isn't an issue, because he lied. He didn't lie? Okay, let's play "spot the lie". When he spoke to the jury, assuring them that he would care for his wife, or when he got the money...which enabled his memory to recall "her wishes".
Which statement is true? I vote neither. You obviously have never had a sociopath in your life. I have, and reply from a different perspective than others.
It is to the posters who were discussing it. Thanks for interrupting.
You obviously have never had a sociopath in your life. I have, and reply from a different perspective than others.
Your personal history excludes you from being able to come to rational conclusions. You judgment is tainted.
Such as?