Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyncooper

The fact is that no law was broken by revealing the Plame worked for the CIA for several reasons. First there was no intent to do damage, second she hadn't been an undercover agent for four years and last of all,it was no secret, she was very free with the information herself. The law is very specific and this just doesn't meet the criteria.

They said on Fox, tonight, that the prosecutor was going for information on conversations other than pertaining to Plame. This has to be what it's about unless they have another side investigation going on.


60 posted on 07/05/2005 10:09:36 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: Eva

Exactly.


61 posted on 07/05/2005 10:19:37 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: Eva

It would be interesting if the leaker turned out to be one of the same CIA agents that Bolton was looking at.


62 posted on 07/05/2005 10:21:20 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson