Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tallguy
It's becoming the Iraqi's war 'to lose'.

But the difference between Iraq and Vietnam is-WE CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE!

It never mattered two sh*ts who ran the shi*hole in Saigon.

It matters, cosmically, if we are chased out of Iraq.

20 posted on 06/27/2005 12:20:55 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Jim Noble
But the difference between Iraq and Vietnam is-WE CAN'T AFFORD TO LOSE!

That was also true for Vietnam, for after Saigon fell, a lot of 'dominoes' started dropping around the globe. The Ford/Carter presidencies were either unable, or in Carter's case, unwilling to oppose a number of national-liberation movements.

The difference here is that the Iraqi's doesn't have a NVA-level opponent to worry about -- that is there is no cross border threat from a major conventional force that could overwelm the Iraqi counter-insurgency force. Our proper role is to counterbalance any external threats (Iran, Syria) as they arise.

24 posted on 06/27/2005 2:44:50 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson