Posted on 06/19/2005 6:04:50 PM PDT by wagglebee
No. It means you put quotes around a word that I did not use.
Greer is no Nazi but the way he does law reminds me of the German judges who dispassionately applied Nazi law.
Is there anybody who still believes this huckster?
He repeatedly lied about his own qualifications, why on Earth should we believe him now?
OK.. so not I am done with Grammar 101.
Got an answer yet?
What motivates Jeb to grandstand in the manner he does over the Terri case?
Is it possible that not all marriages are made in heaven..Whata ya think?
...some truth indeed.
I wasn't aware he was legally blind. Yikes.
I still trust the Doctor who was there and did the autopsy. Of course the "monster" bought him off crowd will never believe him or anyone else who has a different opinion than theirs.
Bad cases make bad law.
Should the State of Florida throw out the laws that say one cannot divorce an incapacitated spouse just because Michael Schiavo is an ass?
OK.. so not I am done with Grammar 101.
Yes, I understood all of that. I never implied "foolish" much less said it, you therefore had no basis for using it as if I had conveyed such a notion.
Stick to what I said and stop reading into it hidden meanings that are not there.
And don't take that "got an answer yet" tone with me. Of course I have an idea why Jeb Bush, a good and decent man who is also honest, called for the investigation. I wouldn't have formed the opinion if I didn't.
Not by me.
The Terripalooza Industry has a lot at stake now and is fighting for its very existence after this autopsy report. There are undoubtedly several nonprofit foundations (with cushy expense accounts) and lots of jobs on the line.
Uh-Oh!
But you digress...And that answer is? Please inform me.
Here you go, let's see if you have an issue with it this time...
The reason why you believe that Jeb Bush is grandstanding is....
How many autopsies involve a police escourt to the coroner's office?
How many medical examiners refuse to have an independent medical examiner present at the time of the autopsy?
How convenient the body was destroyed so no additional examinations could take place.
How many incidents like this involve such incestuous relationships between the Sheriff's Office, the husband and the Courts involved?
I think Terri was murdered. I think she was brain-damaged as a result of an assault upon her by her husband and he then conspired with the nursing home, the Sheriff's Office, and other officials in Pinellas County to have her done away with. I believe he did this so he could marry his live-in roomie, and to prevent any possibility of her recovery to expose his actions which led to her demise.
But then, who am I? Just a schlub who reads the news.
Yes, I know you had a reason to use it; I discerned that immediately. I then corrected your faulty premise but you chose to ignore that and, as is your custom, you prefer to embrace a false notion and reject fact.
As to your obsession with my thoughts? I choose to discuss my informed speculation with those I respect.
As I and others keep pointing out, several doctors were involved here, not just the ME.
The record is extensive.
But then, who am I? Just a schlub who reads the news.
Keep reading, then, and think.
No..the state of Florida should be intelligent enough to legislate exception in guardianship when the spouse is no longer a "spouse".
Then of course if the guardianship is removed from said "spouse" their testimony should be in major question along with their next of kin.
Of course hindsight is 50/50 if indeed they were unable determine his true "marital" status or in layman's terms...were too stupid to see that Micheal may have been an "ass".
It is not up to the state to say an undivorced spouse is no longer a spouse. Do you really want the government to be able to dissolve marriages without the knowledge or consent of the married adult couple?
It would have been a good thing in this one case, but a horrible precedent for the government to set aside legal marriages in the future.
legislate exception in guardianship when the spouse is no longer a "spouse".
I am merely asking who is to decide that a spouse is no longer a spouse.
Well, heaven forbid someone in your family is diagnosed with PVS. I rather doubt you will take them to see a doctor who hasn't cured anyone but keeps telling people how great he is. Hopefully you'll take your family member to someone who will tell the truth and can get actual results.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.