"not that thing that's stupid". A bit grammatically challenged, are you? There was nothing of substance in that article.
No. Although I occasionally make mistakes, there is no grammatical error in that sentence. Was it just too long for you?
There was nothing of substance in that article.
While nothing in it is fundamentally new thinking, what it says is quite substantial. I'd say it is the prevailing view of scientists who think about the meaning of closed, time-like loops which GR does not prohibit.