Sure. It was everybody else's kids who were drinking. Guess this is why the U.S. has 80% of the worlds lawyers.
1 posted on
06/17/2005 8:47:31 AM PDT by
Millee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: Millee
Yea, why worry about that little 5th Amendment thingy.
Gotta protect the kiddies from themselves after all.
L
2 posted on
06/17/2005 8:48:51 AM PDT by
Lurker
(Remember the Beirut Bombing; 243 dead Marines. The House of Assad and Hezbollah did it..)
To: Millee
The Sugar Land police department didn't learn from neighbor Houston. Remember the K-Mart raid?
4 posted on
06/17/2005 8:52:09 AM PDT by
FreePaul
To: Millee
You're exactly right. All these little rich brats think they have a God-given right to screw off just because Daddy has money. I love the parents' reactions: "Not my little Muffy!" Muffy shouldn't have been there in the first place. Sounds like the Clinton "but I never inhaled" defense.
You know that if this were a story about black kids carrying on in Gary or Indianapolis, these same swanky parents would be supporting the cops 110%.
5 posted on
06/17/2005 8:53:36 AM PDT by
opocno
(France, the other dead meat)
To: Millee
Well, can you prove in beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law that any particular teenager was drinking?
Especially, now, with Michael Jackson's defense team free to take new cases for a small fee....
To: Millee
The DA, The Judge and the Mayor who apoints the Police Chief all have need money to run for reelection.
After some huffing and puffing they will admit they screwed up and drop the charges.
The cops will not be disciplined for violating everyones rights.
SO9
To: Millee
Woodring and other parents are also angry because those who received citations were not allowed to take part in extracurricular activities at schoolBingo! We don't want our kids "feelings" to be hurt, by being left out of something. That's why we let them attend parties where there is underage drinking and no adult supervision. Gotta be popular at any cost.
9 posted on
06/17/2005 8:58:41 AM PDT by
QueenBee3
("Phone's ringin dude.")
To: Millee
Fine. Confisgate the parents' homes when their children are involved in any alchohol related crime with injury, even to themselves.
To: Millee
W/probable cause, they do not need a warrant.
And in spite of the "I wasn't drinking" defense, they are just as much in possession as anyone else in the room.
At 19 I was in a car w/some buddies who had some beer.
I had no intention of touching the beer (I hate the taste of the stuff, always have, always will). I wasn't an angel, but I didn't drink then, I don't drink now.
But guess what, I got arrested right along w/them (Small town, local kids cops knew us, etc.). I spent the night in lock-up right along w/them. And I stood in front of the judge just like my buddies did.
The judge acknowledged my non-drinker status (as attested to by several people who knew me), but assessed the same Minor in Possession fine as them. I took it like a man. Today two of those three friends are dead, w/one having also killed another in alcohol related accidents. The lesson I got from it was to pick better friends.
BTW, I have had to answer to that $15.00 for my security clearance for over 25 years every time it comes up for renewal.
But the thought of getting my mother to fight that battle never occurred to me.
To: Millee
These parents are awfully good at hiring lawyers and complaining to reporters, but awfully bad at supervising their teens.
To: Millee
The parents let their underage kids go to a drinking party?
Were they out drinking themselves?
To: Millee
The parent in this incident is nuts. She is the problem.
23 posted on
06/17/2005 9:34:13 AM PDT by
kjo
To: Millee
Spoiled, wealthy little sociopaths who are above the law. Obviously this neighborhood is a breeding ground for future lawyers.
25 posted on
06/17/2005 9:42:16 AM PDT by
FormerACLUmember
(Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
To: Millee
Yeah, if Johnny or Janey had an accident after leaving the party, you can bet your booties that mom and dad would be outraged and suing the owner.
To: Millee
"Sure. It was everybody else's kids who were drinking."
The police were asked to give them Breathalyzer tests in order to determine who was drinking and refused. Why didn't they? Did they just want to bust all of those nasty little rich kids? Put them in their place?
It's so funny how many people on this thread don't even try to hide their hatred of these kids because they are rich. Class bigotry is widespread and no one even bothers to hide it like they would if they were racists. The rich are not a protected class in the politically correct world. They just have to shut up and take it like white people or men or Christians.
All the bigots on this thread should be ashamed of themselves, but I expect they aren't.
32 posted on
06/17/2005 10:29:31 AM PDT by
monday
To: Abram; AlexandriaDuke; Annie03; Babu; Baby Bear; bassmaner; Bernard; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here
To: Millee
A parent, Rene Woodring, said she is fighting the charges because her daughter was not drinking.Funny, my parents would have said "what were you doing at a party like that in the first place, that's what you get, pay the ticket."
50 posted on
06/17/2005 11:57:25 AM PDT by
agrace
(All I have seen teaches me to trust the Creator for all I have not seen. - Ralph Waldo Emerson)
To: Millee
The dumbass cops should have simply charged them all with disorderly conduct, a crime for which there is no defense.
58 posted on
06/17/2005 12:31:23 PM PDT by
Old Professer
(As darkness is the absence of light, evil is the absence of good; innocence is blind.)
To: Millee
Yeah, the U.S. Constitution sucks! Cops rule!
66 posted on
06/17/2005 1:26:15 PM PDT by
Sloth
(Discarding your own liberty is foolish, but discarding the liberty of others is evil.)
To: Millee
Aw fer cryin' out loud. How hard would it have been for these lazy LEOs to give each kid a quick Breathalyzer test? That's the way we used to do it when I was a LEO. There's absolutely NO legal foundation for citing every person present. No probable cause. I'm surprised the prosecutor is even pursuing the case.
73 posted on
06/17/2005 1:58:11 PM PDT by
TChris
(Liberals: All death, all the time.)
To: Millee
"
They also found dozens of beers and other alcoholic beverages. Whitty said police issued citations for minor in possession of alcohol and arrested two people. "
Did they wreck the place?
88 posted on
06/17/2005 10:57:36 PM PDT by
BobS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson