Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinkspur

Well, I think my point has been proven. Nothing has changed here. You believe what you want to believe, I believe what I want to believe, and everyone else does likewise. There is no new evidence here because this official HAS NO CREDIBILITY because he is too involved with the case because of his position. The only way an autopsy would have been relevant is if an independent party had been there, and/or a representative of the Schindlers as they requested. The fact that this ME would not allow this has now left him in this difficult position of LACKING CREDIBILITY. The same as his predecessor. There needs to be an outside investigation of this entire case by an objective party, if one can be found at this point.


109 posted on 06/15/2005 2:36:21 PM PDT by blueblazes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: blueblazes
The only way an autopsy would have been relevant is if an independent party had been there, and/or a representative of the Schindlers as they requested.

The Schindlers wanted Cyril Wecht, a Medical Examiner from Pittsburgh who is, himself, under a federal probe.

Is this your idea of an "outside expert"?

111 posted on 06/15/2005 2:38:31 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

To: blueblazes
There is no new evidence here because this official HAS NO CREDIBILITY because he is too involved with the case because of his position.

Honestly, would you accept any report which came back with a result you didn't like?

168 posted on 06/15/2005 4:35:12 PM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson