[Always Right]

The more I learn about their techniques, the more I can't believe any economist with any creditentials would sign up for any of this. To make their analysis work this is what the assume:

1. Employees take paycut in the amount of income tax.
2. 100% compliance with the sales tax.

Both of these assumptions are ridculous on their face. Contractual obligations that have been fiercely negotiated, just don't go away. 100% compliance, give me a break. Their experts are certifiably nuts.

[EternalVigilance]

If you really believe that ANYONE is claiming one hundred per cent compliance with the FairTax, I want some of that rope you're smoking.

As usual, you're making things up.

[Principled]

To make their analysis work this is what the assume:

1. Employees take paycut in the amount of income tax.
2. 100% compliance with the sales tax.

Both of these assumptions are ridculous on their face. Contractual obligations that have been fiercely negotiated, just don't go away. 100% compliance, give me a break

That's deliberately lying. Neither of those is assumed. It is the position of ttax reform proponents that the contracted wages remain the same.

Lies. Why not try to spread your marxist progressive income tax with truth?

This is all you have left - the death throes of your beloved income tax... like harry reid - never admit anything good about the opponent - no matter how stupid you look doing it.

It won't matter to income tax proponents what happens 7/31. They're be no respite for you socialism mongers.

[pigdog]

Neither of the things you believe are used as assumptions are used by the Fairtax people OR its supporters.

Your claim to the contrary means nothing at all.