Did you actually, ah, READ the piece atop this thread? You should try that sometime--the police are referenced in it twice--THAT is what I was talking about.
You look like a fool when you shoot your mouth off and then simply claim I "implied" anything when I was directly referencing material in the original post.
You seem to have a problem with comprehension so I will type this slowly: In the original article, there are references to the police; I was addressing those specifically as to why I believe the police have every right to this rifle.
If you weren't so rude and weird I'd invite you to ASK me about my opinion of the Second Amendment, but paranoid folks like yourself "just know" what people mean and don't need to ask.
Now go away, trollboy, and invent more lies about other people. You'll get no more sympathy for your obvious problems from me.
So let's have it.
Read more--poor mouth less.....Boot.
I was too late. Oh well, carry on.