To: Dr.Hilarious
The purpose of having a deadly weapon is so the police can use deadly force when they have to; this weapon does that job.This is an example of why I think you are a troll.
The Second Amendment doesn't talk about what sort of weapons the police may have.
32 posted on
05/30/2005 12:35:22 AM PDT by
Lazamataz
(The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
To: Lazamataz
And when did I claim anything about the Second Amendment saying any such thing?
You really shouldn't lie about people that way, it makes you look like...uh, a liar.
So now educate me about how the police shouldn't have deadly weapons because they don't need to use deadly force when necessary, Einstein.
40 posted on
05/30/2005 12:51:25 AM PDT by
Dr.Hilarious
(If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
To: Lazamataz
"The radiation-enhanced Ultimate Computer sat impassively in front of me. "DATA INDICATES AND LOGIC DEMANDS THAT YOU MUST BE TERMINATED," it intoned. Adjusting my solar-protection shield on the space-helmet I was wearing,"
LOL Now I think I understand why you can't understand simple concepts. Have fun in orbit! LOL!
42 posted on
05/30/2005 12:55:08 AM PDT by
Dr.Hilarious
(If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson