Skip to comments.
Big Rifle A Terrorist Tool? [See BS's 60 minutes on the Barrett 50 caliber]
CBS ^
| May 29, 2005
| CBS Worldwide Inc
Posted on 05/29/2005 11:43:58 PM PDT by John Filson
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 241-249 next last
To: Lazamataz
You go right on thinking you have a clue about (anything) my views, based on a specific comment about a specific article. It's fun watching you squirm when you've been shown to be a fool on a public forum. Squirm, trollboy! :)
61
posted on
05/30/2005 1:12:20 AM PDT
by
Dr.Hilarious
(If Al Qaeda took over the judiciary and mainstream media, would we know the difference?)
To: Dr.Hilarious
Yeah, I saw your post further down after I posted. It is concerning that anti-gunners arguing on the basis of lethality of a "battlefield weapon" with no use out side of the military would want the NYCPD to have need for one. Are they shooting down aircraft and disabling tanks, I think not.
62
posted on
05/30/2005 1:13:30 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Thank you US armed forces, for everything you give and have given!)
To: Spktyr
Cooool...*big grin*
Thanks for the info...
I know there are cannon in private hands...and they still compete with them...
Was pretty sure about the aircraft restictions...
Didnt know about arming surplus vehicles(although I should have guessed such) ...I suppose that requires an FFL?
63
posted on
05/30/2005 1:13:47 AM PDT
by
Crim
To: Dr.Hilarious
You go right on thinking you have a clue about (anything) my views, based on a specific comment about a specific article. It's fun watching you squirm when you've been shown to be a fool on a public forum. Squirm, trollboy! :)You need rest.
64
posted on
05/30/2005 1:14:49 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
To: Lazamataz; Dr.Hilarious
"endthematrix, this individual won't answer my question about what his views are about the Second Amendment. Perhaps he will answer you?" Actually I did pose this question in post #50, I have not received a reply.
Dr.Hilarious, we are waiting...
65
posted on
05/30/2005 1:17:02 AM PDT
by
endthematrix
(Thank you US armed forces, for everything you give and have given!)
To: Lazamataz
66
posted on
05/30/2005 1:17:34 AM PDT
by
onyx
(Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
To: Crim
Depends on the state. In TX, if you legally possess a class III weapon (like the M2), you can mount it on your vehicle however you wish, so long as it does not threaten others (no guns on the trunk to discourage tailgaters, for example.
67
posted on
05/30/2005 1:18:28 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: Spktyr
"Conventional" ICBMs are also known as ROCKETS and are available on the open market to anyone. So are cruise missiles, also known as UAVs. If you have money, they're both legal and available.
You didn't answer my question. I didn't ask about the legality (though I suspect there laws that could be applied in the case of an private citizen setting up an SAM battery or ICBM in their backyard), I asked if you thought it was OK for private citizen to own ICBMs, have SAM batteries in their backyard, and cruise missles; legality, commonsense and morality don't always coincide. You apparently have a problem with nukes - what about non-nuclear EMP devices? Could be handy - if you want to get out of a parking ticket just fry all the electronics in the Southeast U.S. thus erasing your parking citation(s). Got heavy penalties due to late/underpaid taxes...no problem. Credit card debt? Gone.
68
posted on
05/30/2005 1:18:35 AM PDT
by
Avenger
To: Crim
Cannon of any size are permitted. The catch is that they must be muzzleloaders.
69
posted on
05/30/2005 1:19:37 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: John Filson
And, as Correspondent Ed Bradley first reported last January, it's powerful enough to kill a man or pierce armor from more than a mile away. Correspondent Ed Bradley is going to pee himself once it's explained to him that one reason the Second Amendment exists is so that the American People can kill the goverment if it becomes too tyrannical.
Yo, Ed! Here's a hint, you moron: Big Stupid Government is not headed in the correct direction down the road.
70
posted on
05/30/2005 1:19:47 AM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: onyx
I have an amazing nose for trolls, and I just have a hunch about this one. From my take on his postings so far, he's either a troll or a very liberal Republican. I could be wrong, but if not, they always out themselves.
71
posted on
05/30/2005 1:19:55 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
To: Spktyr
Well bro...after seeing what a good muzzle loader and crew can do...I'd settle for that...
*even bigger grin*
Good night...if the wife catches me up at 4:21 am...no weapon in the world will defend me...heh heh
72
posted on
05/30/2005 1:22:55 AM PDT
by
Crim
To: Dr.Hilarious; Lazamataz
You signed up
Thursday and are already calling Laz a troll?
How'd you figure him out so quickly, you obviously being As Dumb As A democRat?
73
posted on
05/30/2005 1:23:38 AM PDT
by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: Crim
"BTW...I allready know it is perfectly legal for private citizens to own fighter aircraft of any age...while it is not legal to arm them....look it up." Do you think private citizens should be allowed to arm their aircraft with air-to-air missles? Maybe some JDAMS? Cluster bombs could be fun!
74
posted on
05/30/2005 1:24:07 AM PDT
by
Avenger
To: Crim
Good night...if the wife catches me up at 4:21 am...no weapon in the world will defend me...heh heh Oh my! An area-of-the-house curfew!
75
posted on
05/30/2005 1:24:29 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
To: Avenger
It is legal for a citizen to own a non-nuclear ICBM, cruise missile, or unguided SAM battery in the United States, so what's the point of asking if it's "right"? It's legal NOW, and since all of these things have peaceful uses as well as combat applications, it is ethically, morally, and legally OK to own them.
Non-nuclear omnidirectional EMP devices that actually work have not yet been created. That said, even those marginally effective directional ones are legal if you possess an FCC license.
76
posted on
05/30/2005 1:24:51 AM PDT
by
Spktyr
(Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
To: FreedomCalls
Pretty sure they didn't mean that the specific .50 caliber was invented 22 years ago, but rather that the gun in question was.
77
posted on
05/30/2005 1:25:09 AM PDT
by
Terpfen
(New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
To: Lazamataz; Dr.Hilarious
Since you're always very nice and wickedly humorous, I went ahead and tracked you. Seems like the beef between you to is being carried from thread to thread.
My money is on you for longevity...lol.
78
posted on
05/30/2005 1:25:35 AM PDT
by
onyx
(Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
To: Hank Rearden
LOL.
He'd go a long way towards being viewed as a conservative by simply stating his opinion about the Second Amendment.
79
posted on
05/30/2005 1:26:04 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(The Republican Party is the France of politics.)
To: Spktyr
Number of terrorists dispatched to Shaitan by .50 BMG semiauto rifles - uncountable.As it should be.............
80
posted on
05/30/2005 1:28:25 AM PDT
by
ALASKA
(Bring home the media and then take care of the terrorists....................)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 241-249 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson