Posted on 05/25/2005 3:41:22 AM PDT by billorites
You refer to some words of mine that were poorly written. I've since rephrased the question and I've since been enlightened as to as the general matter of the electromagnetic spectrum. I'm willing to inquire, but unwilling to accept certain propositions without criticism. That's what science is about.
you should know that you are just not going to be considered an authoritative voice on the subject.
LOL! One does not need to have an authoritative voice to point where wild assertions are presented as scientific facts. Besides, you overestimate my concern for your assessment of my voice.
I was wondering if anyone got the reference...
First and foremost, that it communicates in a manner allowing me to comprehend and respond.
Good grief! LOL!
Is the rest of the world supposed to accept this as the only valid definition of what is, or is not, supernatural? If so, why? By what authority do you make this proposition, and with what evidence?
No. That just proves the thing you are communicating with is intelligent, not that it was designed by intelligence. And, what about all those obviously unintelligently designed parts of the human anatomy I asked you about? I never even brought up the problems associated with our digestive system because of our upright stance.
Now we're getting silly - and that's good.
The part where information arises and is communicated without the aid of an intelligent agent.
I did LMAO!
Yuppers. :-)
I cannot believe that creationists are so thick as to not know this.
MUST ... NOT ... POST ... REPLY ...
Let's see. When was the last time I saw an intelligent being manufacture a bad back, a weak knee, and a host of other components that function together in a self-aware being? Maybe if we put all the most intelligent evolutionists together in one room we would have enough intelligence to get the job done. Ya think?
That reply made absolutely no sense at all. Are you off your meds or something?
Oh, no. You don't read people's links, and you think my posts are too long. It's obvious you don't give a crap what I say, or what anyone else says for that matter. All the same, accusing others of ignorance is a good way to make a big hypocrite out of yourself.
maybe it's a secret agent instead.
I can't believe certain people would adopt a convention of speech without considering the implications. Does this mean that only unseen, unobserved things can be supernatural? Perhaps in your world, but your world is not the determinant of objective reality.
I think Patrick Henry's just trying to stretch this thread out so he can get #900. Otherwise why would he bring up athletic supporters?
I already own all primes! I can afford to be generous.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.