Posted on 05/19/2005 7:53:32 PM PDT by xzins
Excellent documentation. Thanks.
>>>so when is the DA going to slap the handcuffs on this guy<<<<
Isn't that when he gets to chapter 3 in the handbook?
Excellent thought...."death-style"....I like it.
David, thanks for the text.
Early morning barf, anyone?
GLSEN recruiting children for homosexual sex.
The really sick party is this is WHY GLSEN was founded. Their mission and job is to encourage and persuade as many CHILDREN to be "fresh meat" for the homosexuals.
This is why they have the "'gay' straight alliance" clubs, they are a DATING SERVICE for adults to recruit children.
http://www.forthechildreninc.com has audio tapes of exactly what these homosexuals want children to do.
EVERY YEAR there is a scandal and every year they DO THE SAME thing, distribute adult sexual material to children.
Thanks for all the information. I plan to print out this thread due to all the info.
Thanks again!
If you are going to paste in stuff that is pages and pages and pages long, use excerpts and a link. Otherwise, it's a thread hijacking, even if you think it's on topic. Or, start your own thread, if you think it's that important and timely and news worthy. That's how it works around here, and always has. It's called "courtesy."
See how EdReform did it at 31. That is the standard protocal around here. If you prefer to load up somebody else's thread with 20 times the information than was contained in the original thread, it's a thread hijacking.
That's fine, but for years and years here on this forum, dumping pages and pages and pages of your pet articles into a thread has constituted a thread hijacking. That's what links and excerpts are for. It's not David Lane's thread to take over, like force-feeding a turkey to a canary. It's just courtesy.
Can't these people be prosecuted? It seems to me that they can at least be charged with corrupting the morals of a minor and practicing medicine without a license. Indeed, if these materials were found on a suspect's computer they would rightly be considered kiddy porn. In a better world these smut purveyors would be charged with theft of a child's innocence.
If the parents of these kids don't file a class action lawsuit, they are the BIGGEST fools on earth!
Posting relevant information is a far cry from hijacking. What you refer to as "pet articles" are on point. If I were to break in and begin a discussion about what laundry detergent best removes axle grease from a poly-cotton blend, well, that would be hijacking. Again, if you want clarification, ask admin. They do more than just zot, after all.
It's not David Lane's thread to take over...
That almost sounds as if you are implying that all responses should be directed to you alone. That is not how a discussion-based forum works best.
Where are the parents??! Arrests should be made for the distribution of pornography to minors.
20 pages of AIDS conspiracy theory text is not on the subject of Massachusetts gay indoctrination of children. Post excerpts, post links, fine. But don't throw a whale on top of the tuna casserole at somebody else's party because you like the flavor.
read later
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.