Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Personal Nuclear Power: New Battery Lasts 12 Years
LiveScience.com ^ | Fri May 13, 5:13 PM ET | Robert Roy Britt

Posted on 05/14/2005 11:20:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin

A new type of battery based on the radioactive decay of nuclear material is 10 times more powerful than similar prototypes and should last a decade or more without a charge, scientists announced this week.

The longevity would make the battery ideal for use in pacemakers or other surgically implanted devices, developers say, or it might power spacecraft or deep-sea probes.

You might also find these nuclear batteries running sensors and other small devices in your home in a few years. Such devices "don't consume much power," said University of Rochester electrical engineer Philippe Fauchet, "and yet having to replace the battery every so often is a real pain in the neck."

Fauchet told LiveScience the batteries could last a dozen years. They're being developed at Rochester and the technology has been licensed by BetaBatt Inc.

How it works

The technology is called betavoltaics. It uses a silicon wafer to capture electrons emitted by a radioactive gas, such as tritium. It is similar to the mechanics of converting sunlight into electricity in a solar panel.

Until now, betavoltaics has been unable to match solar-cell efficiency. The reason is simple: When the gas decays, its electrons shoot out in all directions. Many of them are lost.

"For 50 years, people have been investigating converting simple nuclear decay into usable energy, but the yields were always too low," Fauchet explained. "We've found a way to make the interaction much more efficient, and we hope these findings will lead to a new kind of battery that can pump out energy for years."

Fauchet's team took the flat silicon surface, where the electrons are captured and converted to a current, and turned it into a three-dimensional surface by adding deep pits.

Each pit is about one micron wide. That's four ten-thousandths of an inch. They're more than 40 microns deep.

Tritium is a radioactive form of hydrogen. Mixed with chemicals that emit light, it is used to illuminate exit signs without electricity -- the sort commonly found in schools and other public buildings.

"It is safe and can be implanted in the body," Fauchet said. "The energetic particles emitted by tritium do not penetrate inside the skin."

Tritium emits only low energy particles "that can be shielded by very thin materials, such as a sheet of paper," said Gadeken of BetaBatt. "The hermetically-sealed, metallic BetaBattery cases will encapsulate the entire radioactive energy source, just like a normal battery contains its chemical source so it cannot escape."

The device is detailed in today's issue of Advanced Materials.

Improvements needed

The manufacturing process is standard to the semiconductor industry, so no other technology breakthroughs are needed to bring the batteries to market. Still, don't expect anything on the store shelves for at least two years, Fauchet said. His team is now working to improve the manufacturing process, aiming for batteries many times more efficient than those announced today.

"If we are as successful as we think we may be, it will take less than five years before this technology is adopted," he said.

Graduate student Wei Sun of the University of Toronto was lead author on the paper describing the work, which was supported by the National Science Foundation.

More Stories

Personal Power: Bendable Organic Solar Cells Palmtop Nuclear Fusion Device Invented Power of the Future: 10 Ways to Run the 21st Century HP Envisions Alternative to Transistors Visit LiveScience.com for more daily news, views and scientific inquiry with an original, provocative point of view. LiveScience reports amazing, real world breakthroughs, made simple and stimulating for people on the go. Check out our collection of Image Galleries, Interactive Features, Trivia and more.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: energy

1 posted on 05/14/2005 11:20:21 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

look here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1402588/posts


2 posted on 05/14/2005 11:24:23 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Hey -- but this battery runs 12 years!

;^)


3 posted on 05/14/2005 11:33:46 AM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I do think it's pretty cool. :-)

I saw a promethium-147 battery back in the 60s that operated on the same principle.


4 posted on 05/14/2005 11:37:59 AM PDT by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

So be careful about stocking up on those multi-packs at Sam's lest you inadvertently reach critical mass...


5 posted on 05/14/2005 11:38:22 AM PDT by George Smiley (This tagline deliberately targeted journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I don't know what's a big deal with that. I have a GPS receiver that has a 10 year lith. battery to hold information.


6 posted on 05/14/2005 11:43:30 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("If Love Can't Buy You Happiness, You Don't Know Where To Shop")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer

Probably the nuke battery provides greater power(product of actual voltage and current supplied by the battery), for as much time as comparably sized Lithium-based ones.

Casio has a $30 watch with a 10-year lithium battery.


7 posted on 05/14/2005 11:48:45 AM PDT by CarrotAndStick (The articles posted by me needn't necessarily reflect my opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick

Can you have them in those nuke free zones in the US and elsewhere? (joke)


8 posted on 05/14/2005 11:50:12 AM PDT by SkyDancer ("If Love Can't Buy You Happiness, You Don't Know Where To Shop")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Only bad thing is you'll have to wear a tin foil hat if want to use anything with those batteries in it. :D


9 posted on 05/14/2005 12:23:29 PM PDT by Rane _H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SkyDancer
I don't know what's a big deal with that. I have a GPS receiver that has a 10 year lith. battery to hold information.
This is very common; the difference is, virtually no current is drawn from the 10 yr lithium back-up battery; this little 'nucelar' baby will actually provide usable amounts of current, such as for use in a pacemaker or Verichip tracker device ...
10 posted on 05/14/2005 12:29:05 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CarrotAndStick
Casio has a $30 watch with a 10-year lithium battery.

If the battery is rated for 10 years it's probably good for at least 15. I bought a Timex in 1990 that had a 3-year battery and that sucker lasted until 1998.

11 posted on 05/14/2005 1:16:27 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Each pit is about one micron wide. That's four ten-thousandths of an inch.

Just a quibble, but...

That is an order of magnitude off. Should be

about 0.4 ten thousandths of an inch.

12 posted on 05/14/2005 4:54:34 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more work horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch
about 0.4 ten thousandths of an inch.

Or the easier said and (for me) remembered, "forty millionths" of an inch.
.000 040

13 posted on 05/14/2005 4:59:19 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I just hope they weren't that far off on the life expectancy of the battery.


14 posted on 05/14/2005 5:55:54 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The world needs more work horses, and fewer Jackasses!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson