Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paul C. Jesup

I never argued that such a tax scheme would not have lower compliance costs. That is not my worry but the unintended conswquences of imposing a 30% tax given that there is a psychology of the consumer to deal with. But the crushing effect on Big Ticket items is the killer.


965 posted on 05/22/2005 7:50:52 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 874 | View Replies ]


To: justshutupandtakeit
I never argued that such a tax scheme would not have lower compliance costs. That is not my worry but the unintended conswquences of imposing a 30% tax given that there is a psychology of the consumer to deal with.

Where did the '30%' percent come from? You anti-fairtax people have been saying Fairtax would be '23%' percent.

971 posted on 05/22/2005 8:07:44 PM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]

To: justshutupandtakeit

"I never argued that such a tax scheme would not have lower compliance costs. That is not my worry but the unintended conswquences of imposing a 30% tax given that there is a psychology of the consumer to deal with. But the crushing effect on Big Ticket items is the killer."

So you fully support a system which provides an advantage to foreign producers at the expense of our own domestic producers, sending many thousands of jobs overseas in the process? You believe that, as a matter of public policy, that is what our tax system should be about?


988 posted on 05/23/2005 5:03:24 AM PDT by phil_will1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 965 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson