Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bill1952
He is the commander in Chief and nothing in the constiution or in law procribes differently. Period.

That's a pretty twisted reading of the Constitution. The President has the responsibility to conduct wars that Congress authorizes and not otherwise per Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1 & 11:

Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

Clause 11: To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

Congress has the exclusive power to authorize war. The President runs the show once it is authorized. Period.
27 posted on 05/01/2005 1:32:09 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are REALLY stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Carry_Okie
As CINC he can use weapons as he sees fit. He could be impeached for improper use, but he he pushes button, and a second person in the command authority chain verifies it, we split atoms.

It's the "preserve, protect and defend" mandate.
32 posted on 05/01/2005 1:58:33 PM PDT by MindBender26 (Having my own CAR-15 meant never having to say I was sorry......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
Congress has the exclusive power to authorize war. The President runs the show once it is authorized. Period.

Yeah, but! Korea wasn't 'declared'; Viet Nam wasn't 'declared'; Panama wasn't 'declared'; Grenada wasn't; Balkan bombing wasn't... ad infinitum.

Congress' only real say is control of military purse-strings. Without congressional approval the president can indeed act militarily, it's simply that the costs of such action will have to be taken from some other program within the defense department.

41 posted on 05/01/2005 2:42:44 PM PDT by IonImplantGuru (Give me heaven... or a 637!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

Please do not act as if I have never studied the Constitution.

Absolutely zero that you have posted in any way disagrees with what I posted.

Having the absolute authority as CIC has nothing to do in with declaring war, or with using the military as he sees fit.

It is your view that is twisted.

Why not enlighten us all with your rendition of the last war that congress declared?


71 posted on 05/01/2005 5:56:13 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie
"Congress has the exclusive power to authorize war. The President runs the show once it is authorized. Period."

I'm not arguing, but didn't LBJ's tonkin gulf resolution modify this? And while you might be technically right on "declared" war, I believe VietNam was not a declared war. I believe that the president has some, maybe unlimited options to "go to war" and notify congress after the fact, but I won't bet the farm on any of this.

119 posted on 05/02/2005 8:02:51 PM PDT by de Buillion (God bless John Moses Browning and the NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Carry_Okie

You are forgetting the War Powers Act.


128 posted on 05/03/2005 6:37:03 PM PDT by KingofQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson