Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Siouxz
That's ridiculous. I understand that some people may have a hangup about the "let it all hang out" type of nursing, but c'mon, the kid was covered with a blanket. That security guard was a jerk.

If the kid was covered, this implies the act was concealed. Then how did the guard know that she was breast feeding?

The problem comes from the double standard of baring breasts in public places. If you don't have a baby attached to It, it's licentious and lewd. If a baby is attached, it's loving and nurturing. All these women who bare them for a baby would never dream of baring them for show. This logic drives men nuts.

85 posted on 04/30/2005 7:55:09 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Some say what's good for others, the others make the goods; it's the meddlers against the peddlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: LoneRangerMassachusetts

It's entirely possible that there was a blanket sort of around the kid, but that Mom there wasn't exactly fully covered.

I've seen stuff in public that we'd fine a network for showing.

Hell, I think we DID fine a network for that.


87 posted on 04/30/2005 7:57:16 AM PDT by Xenalyte (I dare you to make less sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson