Skip to comments.
Down with the judicial tyrants who are killing Terri Schiavo! Oops — most of them are Republican...
Salon ^
| 3/25/2005
| Joe Conason
Posted on 03/30/2005 2:46:06 PM PST by grassboots.org
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Ok Republicans are we up to the task of criticizing our own judicial appointees and impeach them like we are threatening to do with the Democrats?
Of course, I disagree with this Dems motives and even his evaluation of the acts of Congress, which I think were courageous, even if untimely.
To: grassboots.org
And how many of those judges had the ABA stamp of approval? It goes a lot deeper.
2
posted on
03/30/2005 2:49:01 PM PST
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
To: grassboots.org
...the roar of fundamentalist rage will sound like the dawn of Armageddon Hmm.... Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton are fundamentalists?
3
posted on
03/30/2005 2:49:23 PM PST
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
To: grassboots.org
I don't care what party these judges claim.....this is still outrageous. The republican judges in this case, are republican in name only.
To: grassboots.org
I would love to throw out the 9 Supremes and start over. They could have done something which means they were good men who did nothing or bad men just like the bad libs on the court. Either way they should be retire.
To: grassboots.org
Ok Republicans are we up to the task of criticizing our own judicial appointees and impeach them like we are threatening to do with the Democrats? Hell, yes. No question.
6
posted on
03/30/2005 2:49:50 PM PST
by
atomicpossum
(Replies should be as pedantic as possible. I love that so much.)
To: grassboots.org
Evil is evil, no matter the clothing.
This is one cause I'm willing to give money to and time, as well.
And if/when something is started to impeach that Bush in Florida I will give money, to that cause, most especially.
He can't defend an helpless woman: No way should he even think he has what it takes to go any further in his political career.
Let him become a full fledged Democrat: That party is more in sway with his actions, if not his words.
To: grassboots.org
You forgot the BARF ALERT in the title.
8
posted on
03/30/2005 2:50:27 PM PST
by
Dashing Dasher
(I think whoever said "sucker born every minute" over estimated the time frame.)
To: TheDon
"Hmm.... Jesse Jackson and Bill Clinton are fundamentalists?"
Good point.
9
posted on
03/30/2005 2:50:37 PM PST
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
To: grassboots.org
Ultimately the Schiavo case may well change the debate over the filibuster, though not as imagined by the likes of Hugh Hewitt, if only because Senate Democrats finally muster the courage and determination to defend the Constitution and an independent judiciary. LOL!!!!!
10
posted on
03/30/2005 2:50:49 PM PST
by
TheDon
(The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON)
To: atomicpossum
I hope there are many many many Republicans out there like you!
11
posted on
03/30/2005 2:51:00 PM PST
by
k2blader
(It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
To: TheDon
Oh and Ralph Nader, and the Village Voice....
12
posted on
03/30/2005 2:51:04 PM PST
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
To: grassboots.org
A tyrant is a tyrant, and should be removed regardless of who placed them into power. Abuse is abuse and needs to be redressed.
13
posted on
03/30/2005 2:52:16 PM PST
by
highlander_UW
(I don't know what my future holds, but I know Who holds my future)
To: grassboots.org
As this article comes from a known liberal/leftist publication I don't agree with the premise.
Republicans who are acting on their conscience are bad. Democrats who sat on their hands are good!
14
posted on
03/30/2005 2:52:17 PM PST
by
rocksblues
(First there was Terri, whose next? You, me, your child, your wife?)
To: grassboots.org
Yep. Put them ALL on the chopping block and warm up the guillotine. Then replace them all with judges who will follow the law. Rinse and repeat as necessary until our courts produce justice.
15
posted on
03/30/2005 2:52:48 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Order "Judges Gone Wild!" Only $19.95 have your credit card handy!)
To: Dashing Dasher
The salient point is accurate.
16
posted on
03/30/2005 2:53:13 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
To: grassboots.org
If the judiciary is so stinking independent, why then do the Democrats insist that every judge must agree with them on the issues, especially social issues? Filibusters are PROOF POSITIVE that there is no such thing as an independent judiciary any more. When judges make law they become poltiical. It's inevitable.
17
posted on
03/30/2005 2:53:46 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
To: grassboots.org
What I find odd is that most people who are for murdering Terri are against abortion.
However, they will say they have a right to CHOOSE when they die. Well, if you feel that way you had best be quite about abortion, after all it is their CHOICE.
The moderates would do well to remember that the Republicans can not win without us. Us being those radical right-to-lifers.
Just a note. I have no problem with people leaving living wills, or telling their family not to keep them on a feed tube or what-have-you, but there are just too many unanswered questions surrounding Terri that it is best we err on the side of life. I mean, why did her husband wait 7 years to say Terri did not live this way?
18
posted on
03/30/2005 2:54:00 PM PST
by
yellowdoghunter
(The Terri issue is legally complicated, but not the moral issue. I want to be on the side of life.)
To: grassboots.org
You bet we're up to it, let the chips fall where they may. Since when does being a Rupublical exonerate one from wrong-headed decisions?
I think Constitutional law should be a required study for every elected official, to have PASSED the course naturally.
19
posted on
03/30/2005 2:55:22 PM PST
by
brushcop
To: TexasTaysor
The republican judges in this case, are republican in name only.
The debates here demonstrate that a large minority on this board are FRINOs.
20
posted on
03/30/2005 2:55:58 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson