[COEXERJ145]

The Supreme Court won't touch this case in a million years.

[COUNTrecount]

A number of the SCOTUS are currently seriously ill or have been recently.They must be updating their Living Wills as I type.

[michigander]

I agree.

[Aliska]

The Supreme Court won't touch this case in a million years.

Why? What do we have one for then?

[Spunky]

"The Supreme Court won't touch this case in a million years."

If it were a b*tt h*le case they would.

[Just mythoughts]

"The Supreme Court won't touch this case in a million years."

That is correct but they couldn't keep their hands offf that sodomy case, even made sodomy a civil right.

America 2005, life is no longer a right but sodomy is a civil right. Congratulations liberals your day has arrived.

[Eva]

Someone posted a Supreme Court case in Missouri that was very similar to the Shiavo case, where the court sided with life. Scalia agreed with the ruling, but added that he didn't think that the court was qualified to make these decisions and that the states should pass laws covering the issue. (or something to that effect)

[middie]

They won't touch it because there is no constitutional issue for them to consider. The paradox is to complain about judicial tyranny while, at the same time, scream because the courts refuse to intercede where there is no basis to do so.