To: Right_in_Virginia
You have to read the law....in a situation #2...considered an EMERGENCY...state will go in and rescue TERRI...without any approval whatsoever....no one can block them that's a law in Florida....judge can not do one little thing about it...Jeb will rescue her tonight....doesn't matter what greer does to block 'em ... its greer that is on shaky ground on what he's done...not the Governor...
551 posted on
03/23/2005 4:59:38 PM PST by
shield
(The Greatest Scientific Discoveries of the Century Reveal God!!!! by Dr. H. Ross, Astrophysicist)
To: shield
Dumb Question, but after following this case for a few years, I'm still not clear on this. . .As far as I know, Terri has never been on life support. How then can her so called "husband" make the decision to have her feeding tube removed? I thought that the question here was should "she be removed from life support?", and in that case, the argument might be made by him that that is what she wanted.(however unlikely that is)
Legally, how has it been determined that a person in Terri's situation must have the feeding tube taken out when she is not on life support?
619 posted on
03/23/2005 5:37:41 PM PST by
adc
("Speak up for those who cannot speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson