Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ruoflaw

The way that the "de novo" thingy was explained on TV the other night led me to believe that the case was to start from SCRATCH---new testimony, new evidence, new everything, which would take a long time, not just 14-15 hours or so....

Right?


342 posted on 03/22/2005 7:49:54 PM PST by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Chief Justice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies ]


To: Txsleuth

The way that the "de novo" thingy was explained on TV the other night led me to believe that the case was to start from SCRATCH---new testimony, new evidence, new everything, which would take a long time, not just 14-15 hours or so....

Right?

Well there is no time limit, but it would take longer than the 1-2 hour time it took the Whittemore court...a true de novo was not done in this case


370 posted on 03/22/2005 7:53:04 PM PST by LegalEagle61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

Right...that is why Whittemore erred seriously...we have to hope that is doesn't cost Terri her life.


373 posted on 03/22/2005 7:53:26 PM PST by atruelady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

To: Txsleuth

I honestly don't know. To look at it fresh, to me means to start over which could be as simple as looking at what the lawyers have filed and listening to the lawyers arguments but I am not a attorney.


452 posted on 03/22/2005 8:05:43 PM PST by ruoflaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson