Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ContemptofCourt

Nor is hearsay.
Also the court seems to fail to address the obvious conflict of interest position of the one uttering the said hearsay evidence.
And you also seem very happy to ignore that fact.
In matters much less serious then life or death decision where one stands to gain financially,people have to recuse themselves from participating in decision making on boards everywhere.
I seem to recall a hell of a fuss being made over Cheney's past relation to Halliburton, and Iraq contracys, soldiers dying for oil and blah blah blah.


1,047 posted on 03/22/2005 11:17:39 AM PST by northernlightsII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1011 | View Replies ]


To: northernlightsII

Excuse me if I'm wrong, but like it or not, Michael is the husband, and there is a legal precedence as to the utterance between a huband and wife. He may have broken his vows according to the church but that is a matter for the church.


1,057 posted on 03/22/2005 11:20:39 AM PST by Military family member (If pro is the opposite of con and con the opposite of pro, then the opposite of Progress is Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson